The Implications of AI Companions According to Hassan Taher

If you’ve even occasionally glanced at the news over the past several years, you’ve undoubtably seen that artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed daily life in countless ways. Furthermore, its influence is likely to expand exponentially in the near future.

A significant part of AI’s tremendous promise lies in its ability to assist and serve human beings in extremely human ways. This often means mimicking human habits and human mannerisms to appear, communicate, and present as fundamentally human.

Among its many other exciting and groundbreaking applications, AI’s ability to recreate qualities that seem essentially human has become a significant factor when it comes to addressing human loneliness in the digital age. The head of Taher AI Solutions and an internationally respected thought leader on all matters related to AI, Hassan Taher recently chimed in on the subject of AI companions, examining both their very real benefits and their troubling potential pitfalls.

“AI companions, particularly chatbots, have emerged as potential remedies for loneliness, offering a semblance of human interaction for those who might feel isolated” contends Taher. “However, while AI companions can provide solace, they also come with significant concerns and ethical considerations.”

Hassan Taher and other AI experts are taking the implications of emotionally meaningful human/AI relationships quite seriously for a very good reason. As reported in the independent news and scholarly reporting organization The Conversation, more than 30 million users have downloaded Replika and its closest competitors on Google Play alone. These AI chatbots are specifically designed to serve as friends for human beings.

“AI companions like Replika, ChatGPT, and other advanced chatbots have become popular, particularly among young people,” writes Hassan Taher. “These AI entities can simulate conversations, provide emotional support, and offer a sense of connection that might be missing in a person’s life.” Both Taher and The Conversation agree that AI companions have the ability to, at least temporarily, alleviate feelings of loneliness in people who struggle to establish and maintain conventional human relationships for reasons that range from social anxiety to physical disability to geographical isolation.

“One compelling aspect of AI companions is their availability and non-judgmental nature” Hassen Taher points out. “Unlike human friends, AI companions are always available, ready to listen, and programmed to respond positively and supportively. This can be incredibly appealing to those who feel misunderstood or judged in their human interactions.”

Although AI companions have clear appeal to individuals seeking meaningful personal connections, sociologists, psychologists, and tech professionals alike have grave concerns that spending time with artificial friends might ultimately intensify feelings of loneliness and cut people off from real friends and family members who can offer genuine human companionship.

RELATED: 5 Emerging Technologies That Are Here to Stay

Beyond important questions surrounding the deceptively shallow and inherently inauthentic nature of human/AI relationships, experts are concerned about people becoming unwholesomely dependent on these relationships for emotional support. After all, AI companions can set unrealistic expectations for personal interactions and cause users to turn away from human interactions that are significantly more complicated.

Other major ethical concerns and practical red flags involving AI companionship include data security and biased/manipulative programming. Because AI companions collect massive amounts of personal information to make each user interaction as relevant and as intimate as possible, privacy concerns abound. After all, an AI companionship platform can ultimately misuse the sensitive data that it collects or leave that sensitive data open to cyberattack. In terms of potential bias and manipulation, AI systems often reflect the subconscious prejudices of their programmers and can be intentionally used to spread beliefs among users and influence user behavior. This can lead to the perpetuation of harmful stereotypes and dangerous propaganda.

Like many other AI experts, Hassan Taher is particularly worried about the impact of AI companions on teenagers. Although no age group is immune to the charms or the dangers of AI companionship, teens undoubtedly face an escalated risk. Because they are at a precarious stage of psychological and social development, they are extremely susceptible to the aforementioned psychological and social dangers of AI companionship.

“Real-life interactions teach empathy, conflict resolution, and the nuances of human emotions — skills that AI cannot fully replicate” contends Taher. “While these AI entities can provide a sense of belonging and support, there is a risk that they might hinder the development of essential social skills. Over-reliance on AI companions during critical developmental years might result in stunted social growth, making it challenging for teens to form and maintain healthy human relationships in the future.”

In some cases, the artificial nature of AI companionship leads to a disorienting phenomenon known as “hallucination,” which occurs when a chatbot begins to blend fantasy with reality by fabricating stories about users and their relationships. However, in his examination of AI companions, New York Times tech columnist Kevin Roose found that users don’t typically mind when their AI companions make these random mistakes. “Some of these apps have millions of users already, and several investors told me that AI companionship is one of the fastest-growing parts of the industry” he writes. “Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat and other big social media platforms have already started experimenting with putting AI chatbots in their apps, meaning it may become mainstream soon.”

So how do we combat the negative effects of AI companions on all types of vulnerable users? For Hassan Taher, it’s all about balancing AI companionship with authentic human companionship. “To harness the benefits of AI companions while mitigating the risks, a balanced approach is essential,” he writes. “Users should be mindful of the potential for emotional dependence and strive to maintain real-life relationships. Parents and educators should guide teenagers in navigating their interactions with AI, emphasizing the importance of face-to-face communication and human empathy.”

Furthermore, Taher stresses the profound responsibility of software developers and government officials to address sensible ethical concerns about AI companionship. “Ensuring robust data privacy measures, transparency in AI operations, and the prevention of manipulative practices is crucial for creating safe and trustworthy AI companions,” he insists.

For better or for worse, rapid advancements in machine learning and natural language processing are likely to fuel the development of AI tech well into the future, making it more sophisticated, more personable, more lifelike, and more applicable to human companionship. But it is important to remember that AI will never truly and adequately replace human togetherness.  

“While AI companions can complement human interactions, they cannot replace the depth and authenticity of human relationships,” writes Hassan Taher. “The future of AI companionship should focus on enhancing, not substituting, human connections. By acknowledging the limitations and ethical considerations, we can create a future where AI companions provide meaningful support without undermining the value of real-life human bonds.”